Revolution vs. Restoration

A wonderful piece over at Social Matter. Arthur Gordian’s essay is long, but worth your time. His (and, of course, Voegelin’s) depiction of modern Gnosticism is very fine.

So many good quotes. Here are some of my favorites:

“the death of the spirit is the price of progress…”

“It steals the language and symbolism of Christianity but imposes a rationalist interpretation that makes those symbols opaque. Forcing an irrational literalism on the corpus mysticum Christi by transferring that symbol to the democratic voting body of the state strips the original symbol of any meaning it preserved, while creating a delusional second-reality around the character of national citizenship. In other words, to equate the equality of membership in the mystical body of Christ with equality of membership in a secular corporate state is an act of egophantic delusion so deep as to require a Hegel-scale of hubris.”

“The progressive seeks the utter destruction of all civilization in order to remake reality in his own image, and in this way to become like God. The conservative, on the other hand, is content to live in a state of semi-ruined civilization, destroying the aspects he disagrees with while assuming the rest of the structure will not fall down upon his head.”

“The Taliban-like desire to destroy the monuments of the past, in the form of the traditions and faith of Western civilization, can only be considered good in the mind of a disordered individual. There are ultimately two forces in the West that struggle for the souls of Man according to Voegelin: the forces of Revolution and Restoration.”

“One cannot teach human equality without teaching death to the naturally unequal, either in the form of Jacobin and communist murder of the above-average or Nazi murder of the below-average. Any social religion of equality is tantamount to a call for mass murder.”

“Political liberalism isn’t a cultural product of Christianity, but a heretical and competing faith.”

On the Gnostic pleasure in transgression: “Ultimately, the greatest transgression for the Enlightenment philosopher is the transgression of treason, not just to the particular ruler of a particular nation but treason against the whole of Western civilization.”

“Tyranny, contrary to the claims of Ratcliffe, is not a function of power but of immorality.”

“Democracy, built on the foundation of destroying the morals of the people in order to ensure uniformity and docility of the population, can tolerate any vice, but healthy families, moral individuals, and orthodox Christianity may not be permitted under such a regime.”

“As has been mentioned numerous times, the equality of Man exists in a spiritual sense, but has no bearing on the nature of secular government because that equality cannot be linked to a world-immanent notion like government without fundamentally perverting its meaning.”

“The notion of a Universal Humanity, often described in these days as a “global citizen,” is fundamentally gnostic in character and destructive. Universal Humanity only exists in the context of the quest by Man to seek conscious participation in divine reality through the Holy Church.”

“Liberal cosmopolitanism crushes reality beneath its incessant demand that the world should be like heaven, when reality demonstrates otherwise. Common sense demonstrates that human beings are not all equal, and the act of violence which forces them to become equal merely serves to make them equal in their destruction.”

On abortion: “Like all victims of gnostic political violence, murdered children are chosen because they are made to be scapegoats for the imposition of reality over the second reality delusion of gnostic political correctness. When the reality of nature and nature’s God imposes itself on a gnostic woman, she must confront the conflict between reality and dogma, as described above. The dogma of liberal democracy is that she is fully equal to men in every way, entitled to a life of pleasure, and is not subject to responsibilities which she has not voluntarily chosen. Nature disagrees.”

On the failure of the Church to stand against Gnostic tyranny and mass murder (abortion, 60 million plus), or the government that allows/encourages it, or the liberal democratic structure of Western Civilization that fosters only corruption: “No major denomination has ever challenged the legitimacy of the American tyranny on the grounds that complicity with the regime made them party to the deaths of tens of millions.”

Reaction And The Charge Of Gnosticism: A Discussion On Voegelin

The Right Message, From Porter

This is really just an excuse to link to the mighty Porter, who IMO is the best blogger in the biz. This article does touch on a topic we covered recently in The State of Dis-Grace, so I think my excuse is plausible. Relevant quote: “A cut I haven’t yet mentioned is the one left by progressive degeneracy. As these are creatures who can only swallow while swimming, they must continually push forward for sustenance. Yesterday’s advance is merely today’s tradition, and so must be succeeded by more rapid advances still. That is how we went from expressions of mild disgust for homosexuals, to ordaining them as moral exemplars in one generation.”

Best quote is the next line: “But championing men who sexually gratify other men in the women’s bathroom may as well be the Waltons at this point. The real civil rights initiative is to fully suppress the human gag reflex before it can mature.”

So, without further ado, feast your eyes: The Right Message Indeed

A Pagan Knows the Score

Another good one from Zman, highlighting yet another reason why Christian culture is always superior to any other faith system. Christianity lifts cultures, it doesn’t destroy and replace them. It doesn’t obliterate a culture’s past or identity.

Gnosticism always kills the host.

The Death of You

The State of Dis-Grace

While I’m on a roll today, this has been rolling around in my head for a while. A nod to ZMan for this line of thinking. I should link to his article, but I’m too lazy to find it right now. Anyway, a lot of this is plagiarized from him, so I’m an honest thief.

A comparison between Christianity and Gnosticism:

The Church holds that grace is passive, and sin in active. This means that the believer rests in a state of grace (or that grace rests upon the believer), and unless he actively sins, he remains in good standing with the Church. Kind of like innocent until proven guilty. Once he confesses, does penance, etc. he is back in good standing with the Church

Gnosticism is the opposite. Grace is active and sin is passive. It is sin that rests on the believer (a state of dis-grace), and to be in good standing with the Cathedral he must actively commit pious deeds (renouncing racism, sexism, etc., or denouncing racists, sexists, etc.).

Now, since grace to them is active, and sinfulness rests upon them, they have to constantly prove themselves worthy. This explains the incessant striving of Gnostics. They never quit, because they can’t quit. Furthermore, every time someone goes further (progresses) in an act of piety, that becomes the new bar for good standing with the Cathedral. This explains why in 50 short years we went from civil rights to feminism to gay marriage to mentally ill men in sundresses having a constitutional right to piss in front of your daughters in public (that was also stolen from ZMan).

It’s easy to think of the Left as irrational, but when you understand Gnosticism and it’s moral orthodoxy, everything they do makes perfect sense. They act the way they do because they have to act the way they do.